Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare vs Udaysing Maniram Rathod — 44/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 25th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070013922024
e-Filing Number
08-07-2024
Filing Number
236/2024
Filing Date
10-07-2024
Registration No
44/2024
Registration Date
10-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare
Adv. PINJARKAR DIGAMBAR KRISHNARAO
Respondent(s)
Udaysing Maniram Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Manohar v. Udaysingh (RCS 44/2024) The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare, restraining respondents Udaysingh Maniram Rathod and his sister from obstructing his lawful possession and cultivation of agricultural land (1H 15R) in Gat No.11, Mouza Devchandi, Washim district. The court found the petitioner had a prima facie case based on documentary evidence of ownership through family partition (2005), balance of convenience favoring the farmer-petitioner over respondents who admitted only occasional cultivation, and irreparable loss if obstruction continued until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Manohar v. Udaysingh (RCS 44/2024) The court granted an interim injunction in favor of petitioner Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare, restraining respondents Udaysingh Maniram Rathod and his sister from obstructing his lawful possession and cultivation of agricultural land (1H 15R) in Gat No.11, Mouza Devchandi, Washim district. The court found the petitioner had a prima facie case based on documentary evidence of ownership through family partition (2005), balance of convenience favoring the farmer-petitioner over respondents who admitted only occasional cultivation, and irreparable loss if obstruction continued until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts