State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Karanja City vs Jumma Chandu Pappuwale — 90/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS070010732021
Filing Number
986/2021
Filing Date
02-Jun-2021
Registration No
90/2021
Registration Date
02-Jun-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
Police Station Karanja City
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Karanja City
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jumma Chandu Pappuwale
-
2.Rahim Chandu Pappuwale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 90/2021 State of Maharashtra v. Jumma Chandu Pappuwale & Rahim Chandu Pappuwale On March 24, 2026, the court acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 506 (read with Section 34), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite the complainant's account of a beating incident on January 31, 2021, critical inconsistencies in witness testimony and a subsequent settlement between the parties undermined the prosecution's case, warranting complete acquittal of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
08-May-2025
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
26-Mar-2025
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
26-Sep-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
02-May-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
20-Apr-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
20-Mar-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
29-Feb-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
29-Nov-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
09-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
07-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
12-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
09-Mar-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
09-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
08-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
07-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
27-Apr-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
27-Jan-2022
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
25-Nov-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
08-Jul-2021
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C. Karanja.
-
02-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2021
Case Summary: 90/2021 State of Maharashtra v. Jumma Chandu Pappuwale & Rahim Chandu Pappuwale On March 24, 2026, the court acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 324 and 506 (read with Section 34), finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that despite the complainant's account of a beating incident on January 31, 2021, critical inconsistencies in witness testimony and a subsequent settlement between the parties undermined the prosecution's case, warranting complete acquittal of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts