Government of Maharashtra Medical Superintendent and Taluka Appropriate Through Dr N R Salunkhe vs Dr Rajani Mahadeo Rathod — 54/2025

Case under Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules Section 6,23,24,5,6(2),9(1),(4)(6)(7),10(1-A),17-1-2. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHWS070004362025

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2025

Filing Number

337/2025

Filing Date

25-02-2025

Registration No

54/2025

Registration Date

25-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja

Acts & Sections

Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules Section 6,23,24,5,6(2),9(1),(4)(6)(7),10(1-A),17-1-2

Petitioner(s)

Government of Maharashtra Medical Superintendent and Taluka Appropriate Through Dr N R Salunkhe

Respondent(s)

Dr Rajani Mahadeo Rathod

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja

21-05-2026

Awaiting Summons

27-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

16-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

11-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

Interim Orders

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCC 54/2025 The court found prima facie evidence that Dr. Rajani Mahadeo Rathod (Accused 1) and four co-accused were conducting illegal pre-natal sex determination procedures in violation of the PCPNDT Act, 1994. The raid revealed the accused charged ₹20,000-25,000 for sex determination services and failed to maintain mandatory records including Form-F. The court issued process and ordered summons against all five accused under Sections 5, 6, 23, 25, and 22(1)(2) of the PCPNDT Act read with Rules 9-10 of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC 54/2025 The court found prima facie evidence that Dr. Rajani Mahadeo Rathod (Accused 1) and four co-accused were conducting illegal pre-natal sex determination procedures in violation of the PCPNDT Act, 1994. The raid revealed the accused charged ₹20,000-25,000 for sex determination services and failed to maintain mandatory records including Form-F. The court issued process and ordered summons against all five accused under Sections 5, 6, 23, 25, and 22(1)(2) of the PCPNDT Act read with Rules 9-10 of the PCPNDT Rules, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case