Balvant Nanappa Bonte(Legal Heir) vs Vijay Narayanrao Gulwade Advocate - JOHARAPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR — 1400019/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39,06. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 03rd February 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070003972014
Filing Number
1400058/2014
Filing Date
19-04-2014
Registration No
1400019/2014
Registration Date
22-04-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
Decision Date
03rd February 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balvant Nanappa Bonte(Legal Heir)
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak1.
Nalini Balwant Bonte
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak1.
Sarita Sandipappa Ramapure
Ravindra Nanappa Bonte(Legal Heir)
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak2.
Pushpa Ravindra Bonte
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak2.
Sau. Gouri Nilesh Godhave 2.
Radha Amol Naringe
Shivanand Nanappa Bonte
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak
Respondent(s)
Vijay Narayanrao Gulwade Advocate - JOHARAPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR
Lilabai Madhukarappa Bonte
Aruna Ravindrappa Dive
Smt. Asha Ashokappa Balte
Shobhabai Dinkarappa Bonte
Prashant Dinkarappa Bonte
Manoj Dinkarappa Bonte
Sunita Madhukar Hingmire
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Dn. and J.M.F.C Karanja
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-02-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 30-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 22-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 17-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
The court allowed defendant no.1's application to amend the written statement in this land encroachment suit, permitting inclusion of a subsequent Tahsildar order (dated 18-09-2015) that corrected the 7/12 extract of survey no.156, reducing the plaintiff's ancestor's land by 0.07 acres to account for road acquisition. The court found the amendment bonafide, necessary to plead a subsequent event, and concluded it would not change the suit's nature or prejudice the plaintiff since trial had not commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed defendant no.1's application to amend the written statement in this land encroachment suit, permitting inclusion of a subsequent Tahsildar order (dated 18-09-2015) that corrected the 7/12 extract of survey no.156, reducing the plaintiff's ancestor's land by 0.07 acres to account for road acquisition. The court found the amendment bonafide, necessary to plead a subsequent event, and concluded it would not change the suit's nature or prejudice the plaintiff since trial had not commenced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts