State of Maharashtra vs Yunus Khan Hiyamat Khan — 89/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS070001722025
Filing Number
125/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
89/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
334
Police Station
Police Station Karanja Rural
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Yunus Khan Hiyamat Khan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted defendant Yunus Khan Hiyamat Khan of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 90ml of illegal liquor on August 28, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness could not corroborate the prosecution's allegations and the chemical sample examination report was not properly authenticated. Consequently, the defendant was acquitted and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted defendant Yunus Khan Hiyamat Khan of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing 90ml of illegal liquor on August 28, 2024. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole witness could not corroborate the prosecution's allegations and the chemical sample examination report was not properly authenticated. Consequently, the defendant was acquitted and his bail bond was cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts