Pramod Maroti Jadhao vs Himmat Anandrao Gorade Advocate - JOHARAPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR — 1400006/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 13th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070001522014
Filing Number
1400028/2014
Filing Date
20-02-2014
Registration No
1400006/2014
Registration Date
20-02-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramod Maroti Jadhao
Adv. Khan Juned Mubarak
Respondent(s)
Himmat Anandrao Gorade Advocate - JOHARAPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR
Municipal Council, Karanja Lad
Adv. PINJARKAR DIGAMBAR KRISHNARAO
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 25-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 29-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 05-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include mandatory injunction relief and correct suit valuation details, which were inadvertently omitted despite prior amendment permission in 2019. The court found the amendment bonafide and necessary for proper adjudication, but imposed costs of Rs. 500 on each defendant as penalty for the plaintiff's negligence, directing completion within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include mandatory injunction relief and correct suit valuation details, which were inadvertently omitted despite prior amendment permission in 2019. The court found the amendment bonafide and necessary for proper adjudication, but imposed costs of Rs. 500 on each defendant as penalty for the plaintiff's negligence, directing completion within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts