Pyare Ramzu Pyarewale vs Nanda Ghasi Garve Advocate - KHAN KAMIL MOHAMMAD — 7/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 16th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070001502017
Filing Number
11/2017
Filing Date
20-01-2017
Registration No
7/2017
Registration Date
20-01-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pyare Ramzu Pyarewale
Adv. MUDASSAR NADEEM
Respondent(s)
Nanda Ghasi Garve Advocate - KHAN KAMIL MOHAMMAD
Salim Nanda Garve
Chief Officer, M. C. Karanja Lad
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Report
Report
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Report |
| 25-02-2026 | Report |
| 29-01-2026 | Report |
| 03-01-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner (T.I.L.R, Karanja) to conduct a joint measurement of disputed government land (Nazul sheet plots 119, 122, and 124) at Kasabe Karanja, Washim district. The plaintiff had alleged encroachment and illegal construction by adjacent plot owners, which the defendants denied; the court found that appointing a surveyor to measure the disputed land and establish authentic boundaries was the settled legal principle for resolving boundary disputes. The commissioner was directed to complete the survey and file a report within two months, with measurement charges to be paid by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner (T.I.L.R, Karanja) to conduct a joint measurement of disputed government land (Nazul sheet plots 119, 122, and 124) at Kasabe Karanja, Washim district. The plaintiff had alleged encroachment and illegal construction by adjacent plot owners, which the defendants denied; the court found that appointing a surveyor to measure the disputed land and establish authentic boundaries was the settled legal principle for resolving boundary disputes. The commissioner was directed to complete the survey and file a report within two months, with measurement charges to be paid by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts