Simran Parveen Sheikh Imam vs Sheikh Imam Sk Hasan — 92/2025
Case under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 24th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS050004652025
e-Filing Number
05-08-2025
Filing Number
527/2025
Filing Date
05-Aug-2025
Registration No
92/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
4-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Simran Parveen Sheikh Imam
Adv. ABDUL HAKEEM ABDUL SAMAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sheikh Imam Sk Hasan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 92/2025 The court decreed the dissolution of marriage between Simran Parveen Shaikh Imam (plaintiff) and Shaikh Imam Shaikh Hasan (defendant) under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939. The court found that the defendant treated the plaintiff with cruelty through physical and mental abuse over dowry demands, drove her from the house, and failed to provide maintenance despite prior court orders, satisfying grounds for dissolution. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
13-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
18-Nov-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
07-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr.Dn
-
08-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2025
Summary of Case 92/2025 The court decreed the dissolution of marriage between Simran Parveen Shaikh Imam (plaintiff) and Shaikh Imam Shaikh Hasan (defendant) under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939. The court found that the defendant treated the plaintiff with cruelty through physical and mental abuse over dowry demands, drove her from the house, and failed to provide maintenance despite prior court orders, satisfying grounds for dissolution. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts