Tulsiram Suryabhan War vs Meharunissa Sarfrajkha Advocate - BANG PRASHANT RAMNIWAS — 79/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 38, 39. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS050004412024
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-09-2024
Filing Number
787/2024
Filing Date
27-09-2024
Registration No
79/2024
Registration Date
05-10-2024
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tulsiram Suryabhan War
Adv. Ram Joshi
Respondent(s)
Meharunissa Sarfrajkha Advocate - BANG PRASHANT RAMNIWAS
Anishkha Sarfrajkha
Adv. BANG PRASHANT RAMNIWAS
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 09-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 09-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 01-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 79/2024 In this civil case, the defendants' application to set aside a "no written statement" order (dated 07/02/2025) was allowed. The court found that the defendants failed to file their written statement due to unavailability of documents but had appeared through their advocate. Applying principles of natural justice and the right to be heard, the court set aside the default order to enable a fair adjudication of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 79/2024 In this civil case, the defendants' application to set aside a "no written statement" order (dated 07/02/2025) was allowed. The court found that the defendants failed to file their written statement due to unavailability of documents but had appeared through their advocate. Applying principles of natural justice and the right to be heard, the court set aside the default order to enable a fair adjudication of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts