Dilip Manoher Muley vs Balaji Haribhau Khade Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar — 103/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS050002152021
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
214/2021
Filing Date
02-09-2021
Registration No
103/2021
Registration Date
02-09-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dilip Manoher Muley
Adv. Undal Mahesh Digambar
Seema Dilip Muley
Adv. Undal Mahesh Digambar
Respondent(s)
Balaji Haribhau Khade Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar
Tahsildar Saheb Tahsil Office
Village Officer Pardi Taad
Talathi At Pedgaon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - R.C.S. 103/2021 The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application for permission to file a written statement (w.s.) despite it being filed beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge held that the written statement was necessary for complete adjudication and that granting permission would not prejudice either party, whereas rejection would prejudice the defendant and result in incomplete adjudication. The written statement was taken on record with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - R.C.S. 103/2021 The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application for permission to file a written statement (w.s.) despite it being filed beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge held that the written statement was necessary for complete adjudication and that granting permission would not prejudice either party, whereas rejection would prejudice the defendant and result in incomplete adjudication. The written statement was taken on record with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts