Dilip Manoher Muley vs Balaji Haribhau Khade Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar — 103/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS050002152021
Filing Number
214/2021
Filing Date
02-Sep-2021
Registration No
103/2021
Registration Date
02-Sep-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dilip Manoher Muley
Adv. Undal Mahesh Digambar
-
2.Seema Dilip Muley
Adv. Undal Mahesh Digambar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Balaji Haribhau Khade Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar
-
2.Tahsildar Saheb Tahsil Office
-
3.Village Officer Pardi Taad
-
4.Talathi At Pedgaon
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
Arguments
-
04-May-2026
Arguments
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
-
01-Apr-2026
Arguments
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
-
17-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
-
18-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
-
03-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
-
13-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
-
30-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
-
10-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
-
26-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
-
19-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
-
11-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
04-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
24-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
19-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
25-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
18-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
09-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
18-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
27-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
08-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
27-Jan-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
06-Dec-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
02-Nov-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
04-Oct-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
23-Aug-2022
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
25-Jul-2022
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
16-Jun-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
30-Apr-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary - R.C.S. 103/2021 The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application for permission to file a written statement (w.s.) despite it being filed beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge held that the written statement was necessary for complete adjudication and that granting permission would not prejudice either party, whereas rejection would prejudice the defendant and result in incomplete adjudication. The written statement was taken on record with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
19-Apr-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
17-Mar-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
17-Feb-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
17-Feb-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
16-Feb-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
15-Feb-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
08-Feb-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
05-Feb-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
29-Jan-2022
Order
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
21-Dec-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
13-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
08-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
23-Nov-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
20-Nov-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
27-Oct-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
11-Oct-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
30-Sep-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
28-Sep-2021
Documents
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
20-Sep-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
-
07-Sep-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2021
Case Summary - R.C.S. 103/2021 The court allowed Defendant No. 1's application for permission to file a written statement (w.s.) despite it being filed beyond the prescribed time limit. The Civil Judge held that the written statement was necessary for complete adjudication and that granting permission would not prejudice either party, whereas rejection would prejudice the defendant and result in incomplete adjudication. The written statement was taken on record with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts