Govind Tukaram Mashidkar vs Executive Eng. Minor Irregation Wahim Advocate - AKOTKAR VIJAY TUKARAMJI — 1300141/2013
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHWS050001622011
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
1301002/2011
Filing Date
21-10-2011
Registration No
1300141/2013
Registration Date
28-10-2013
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govind Tukaram Mashidkar
Adv. SANTOSH S BHINGARE
Babanrao Govind Mashidkar(Legal Heir) 2.
Kamalabai Babrrao Mashidkar 2.
Pratibha Babanrao Mashidkar 2.
Prashant Babanrao Mashidkar
Respondent(s)
Executive Eng. Minor Irregation Wahim Advocate - AKOTKAR VIJAY TUKARAMJI
State of Maharashtra through collector
Adv. A.G.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division, Mangrulpir
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 24-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1300141/2013 Outcome: The court granted the petition (application No. 31), permitting the petitioners (Govind Tukaram Mashidkar, Babanrao Govind Mashidkar as legal heir, and Kamalabai Babrrao Mashidkar) to file nine additional documents on record in their land acquisition case under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Civil Judge found these documents relevant to the petitioners' evidence in the pending reference and allowed their submission despite the delay, noting that the respondent would have opportunity to cross-examine witnesses regarding these documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1300141/2013 Outcome: The court granted the petition (application No. 31), permitting the petitioners (Govind Tukaram Mashidkar, Babanrao Govind Mashidkar as legal heir, and Kamalabai Babrrao Mashidkar) to file nine additional documents on record in their land acquisition case under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Civil Judge found these documents relevant to the petitioners' evidence in the pending reference and allowed their submission despite the delay, noting that the respondent would have opportunity to cross-examine witnesses regarding these documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts