Shivchand Uttam Rathod vs Kashinath Maroti Mahalle Advocate - SARKALE SANTOSH NARAYANRAO — 29/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS050001292026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division,Link Court,Mangrulpi
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivchand Uttam Rathod
Adv. MOHD MARUF KHAN AFZAL KHAN
-
2.Ramchandra Uttam Rathod
Adv. MOHD MARUF KHAN AFZAL KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kashinath Maroti Mahalle Advocate - SARKALE SANTOSH NARAYANRAO
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
08-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Shivchand Uttam Rathod v. Kashinath Maroti Mahalle (RCS 29/2026) The court rejected the defendant's application to dismiss the plaint. Plaintiffs filed suit for declaration and perpetual injunction regarding agricultural lands, challenging a Tahsildar's order directing a way to remain open. The court held that proceedings under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act are summary in nature and do not bar civil court jurisdiction, that withdrawal of prior revision proceedings doesn't prevent filing a substantive suit, and that non-joinder of statutory authorities is not grounds for rejection. The suit proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
04-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
25-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
Jt.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Mangrulpir
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2026
Case Summary: Shivchand Uttam Rathod v. Kashinath Maroti Mahalle (RCS 29/2026) The court rejected the defendant's application to dismiss the plaint. Plaintiffs filed suit for declaration and perpetual injunction regarding agricultural lands, challenging a Tahsildar's order directing a way to remain open. The court held that proceedings under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act are summary in nature and do not bar civil court jurisdiction, that withdrawal of prior revision proceedings doesn't prevent filing a substantive suit, and that non-joinder of statutory authorities is not grounds for rejection. The suit proceeds to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts