Murlidhar Ramkrushna Raut vs Sarpanch G.P Pimpri Kurd smt laxmi haridas kokre Advocate - Bansod Pramod Pundlikrao — 984/2019
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHWS040017322019
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
1550/2019
Filing Date
23-12-2019
Registration No
984/2019
Registration Date
23-12-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murlidhar Ramkrushna Raut
Adv. RATHI GHANSHAMDAS BANKATLALJI
Respondent(s)
Sarpanch G.P Pimpri Kurd smt laxmi haridas kokre Advocate - Bansod Pramod Pundlikrao
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 13-05-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 04-05-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 13-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 18-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SCC 984/2019 - Murlidhar v. Sarpanch & Another Accused No. 2 applied to delete his name from a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, arguing the cheque was returned due to signature mismatch and he had since been transferred. The court rejected the application, holding that signature mismatch constitutes valid dishonour under Section 138, and there is no procedural power to delete an accused's name once process has been issued in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC 984/2019 - Murlidhar v. Sarpanch & Another Accused No. 2 applied to delete his name from a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, arguing the cheque was returned due to signature mismatch and he had since been transferred. The court rejected the application, holding that signature mismatch constitutes valid dishonour under Section 138, and there is no procedural power to delete an accused's name once process has been issued in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts