Sau. Trupti Paresh Deshmukh and 01 vs Paresh Panjabrao Deshmukh and 04 Advocate - DHENGALE SHESHRAO SAHEBRAO — 39/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHWS040017022022
Filing Number
1575/2022
Filing Date
07-09-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
07-09-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau. Trupti Paresh Deshmukh and 01
Adv. Bakhade Sachin Govindrao
Ku. Trupti Paresh Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
Paresh Panjabrao Deshmukh and 04 Advocate - DHENGALE SHESHRAO SAHEBRAO
Panjabrao Ajabrao Deshmukh
Hemlata Panjabrao Deshmukh
Sachin Panjabrao Deshmukh
Priti Sachin Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sau. Trupti Paresh Deshmukh v. Paresh Panjabrao Deshmukh (P.W.D.V.A. 39/2022) The court partly allowed the domestic violence application, finding that the petitioner was subjected to physical, verbal, emotional, and economic abuse by her husband. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹8,000/month maintenance (₹5,000 for wife, ₹3,000 for minor daughter), ₹3,000/month rent, and ₹25,000 compensation, while rejecting unproven claims regarding ornaments and forced abortion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sau. Trupti Paresh Deshmukh v. Paresh Panjabrao Deshmukh (P.W.D.V.A. 39/2022) The court partly allowed the domestic violence application, finding that the petitioner was subjected to physical, verbal, emotional, and economic abuse by her husband. The court ordered the respondent to pay ₹8,000/month maintenance (₹5,000 for wife, ₹3,000 for minor daughter), ₹3,000/month rent, and ₹25,000 compensation, while rejecting unproven claims regarding ornaments and forced abortion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts