State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir vs Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar — 188/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHWS040016652021

Case disposed

Filing Number

1506/2021

Filing Date

24-08-2021

Registration No

188/2021

Registration Date

24-08-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir

Judge

1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

960

Police Station

Police Station, Mangrulpir, Dist.Washim

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 294,323,506,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar

Yogesh Vishnu Hajare

Ashish Vishnu Hajare

Vijay Vishnu Harare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

21-04-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

07-03-2026

Arguments

21-02-2026

Arguments

10-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

21-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case