State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir vs Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar — 188/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHWS040016652021
Filing Number
1506/2021
Filing Date
24-08-2021
Registration No
188/2021
Registration Date
24-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
960
Police Station
Police Station, Mangrulpir, Dist.Washim
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar
Yogesh Vishnu Hajare
Ashish Vishnu Hajare
Vijay Vishnu Harare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts