State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir vs Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar — 188/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHWS040016652021

Filing Number

1506/2021

Filing Date

24-Aug-2021

Registration No

188/2021

Registration Date

24-Aug-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir

Judge

1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

960

Police Station

Police Station, Mangrulpir, Dist.Washim

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294,323,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O P.S Mangrulpir

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and 03 Advocate - Girdekar Manish DNyaneshwar

  2. 2.Yogesh Vishnu Hajare

  3. 3.Ashish Vishnu Hajare

  4. 4.Vijay Vishnu Harare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  9. 10-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  10. 18-Feb-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  11. 18-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  12. 25-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir

  13. 23-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  14. 29-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  15. 27-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  16. 16-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Warrant

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  17. 26-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  18. 17-May-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  19. 24-Mar-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  20. 25-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  21. 22-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  22. 05-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  23. 14-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  24. 15-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  25. 30-Dec-2021

    Appearance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir

  26. 19-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 24-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 188/2021 Court Decision: The Mangrulpir First Class Magistrate court acquitted all four accused (Vishnu Pandurang Hajare and his three sons - Yogesh, Ashish, and Vijay) of charges under IPC Sections 294, 323, and 506 read with Section 34 on April 21, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of abusive language, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation, as the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt despite witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case