Artimala Ganesh Masolkar and 1 vs Ganesh Satvarao Masolkar and 3 Advocate - SHRUNGARE BALRAJ YUVRAJ — 36/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHWS040015762022
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
1460/2022
Filing Date
10-08-2022
Registration No
36/2022
Registration Date
10-08-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station, Mangrulpir, Dist.Washim
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Artimala Ganesh Masolkar and 1
Adv. RATHI GHANSHAMDAS BANKATLALJI
Shrikant Ganesh Masolkar
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Satvarao Masolkar and 3 Advocate - SHRUNGARE BALRAJ YUVRAJ
Smt. Panchafula Satwarao Masolkar
Adv. SHRUNGARE BALRAJ YUVRAJ
Sau. Warsha Govind Bhabhulkar
Adv. SHRUNGARE BALRAJ YUVRAJ
Sau.Sangita Sanjay Manulkar
Adv. SHRUNGARE BALRAJ YUVRAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 20-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 36/2022 Outcome: Application rejected. The wife (Artimala) and son sought interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming Rs. 25,000/month plus rent. The court found domestic relationship established but rejected the application, noting the respondent's limited income (Rs. 6,000/month), lack of permanent employment, and existing financial obligations to maintain two daughters and an elderly mother. The applicant was already receiving Rs. 3,500/month maintenance in a related Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMP 226/2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 36/2022 Outcome: Application rejected. The wife (Artimala) and son sought interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, claiming Rs. 25,000/month plus rent. The court found domestic relationship established but rejected the application, noting the respondent's limited income (Rs. 6,000/month), lack of permanent employment, and existing financial obligations to maintain two daughters and an elderly mother. The applicant was already receiving Rs. 3,500/month maintenance in a related Hindu Marriage Act petition (HMP 226/2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts