Mamta Rahul Gulde and 02 vs Rahul Shantarm Gulde and — 36/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.
PWDVA Appln.
CNR: MHWS040014722023
e-Filing Number
19-10-2023
Filing Number
1361/2023
Filing Date
20-10-2023
Registration No
36/2023
Registration Date
20-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mamta Rahul Gulde and 02
Adv. PAWAR ANIL RAMDHAN
Harsh Rahul Gulde through guardian mother applicant no. 01
Adv. PAWAR ANIL RAMDHAN
Ritika Rahul Gulde hrough guardian mother applicant no. 01
Adv. PAWAR ANIL RAMDHAN
Respondent(s)
Rahul Shantarm Gulde and
Shantaram Nivrutti Gulde
Sukhdev Shantaram Gulde
Suvran Sukhdev Gulde
Chandrankant Chavan
Sangita Chandrakant Chavan
Vidhya Prakaash Surve
Prakash Surve
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt.Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Mangrulpir
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Mamta's domestic violence application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 19, 20, and 22, for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant and her advocate were repeatedly absent and failed to proceed with the matter or adduce evidence, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate dismissed Mamta's domestic violence application filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act seeking reliefs under Sections 18, 19, 20, and 22, for want of prosecution. The court found that the applicant and her advocate were repeatedly absent and failed to proceed with the matter or adduce evidence, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts