Ramesh Pandurang Bhagat vs Manorama Shalikram Raut Advocate - BANG RAMNIWAS CHANDANMAL1. — 1300005/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 12th September 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS040000772015
Next Hearing
12th September 2026
Filing Number
1300007/2015
Filing Date
23-01-2015
Registration No
1300005/2015
Registration Date
23-01-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Mangrulpir
Judge
1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Pandurang Bhagat
Adv. THAKARE BHIKAJI MAHADEO
Rajani shamrao Wairagade
Adv. THAKARE BHIKAJI MAHADEO
Respondent(s)
Manorama Shalikram Raut Advocate - BANG RAMNIWAS CHANDANMAL1.
Vijaya Shaligram Raut 1.
Chhaya Shaligram Raut
Arvind Motiram Bhagat
Adv. BANG RAMNIWAS CHANDANMAL
Sushma Arvind bhagat
Adv. BANG RAMNIWAS CHANDANMAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt Civil JudgeJ.D.Mangrulpir
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 03-02-2026 | Steps |
| 03-12-2025 | Steps |
| 03-11-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ramesh Pandurang Bhagat & Rajani Shamrao Wairagade v. Manorama Shalikram Raut (1300005/2015) Outcome: Application allowed. The court condoned the delay and permitted the plaintiffs to file an application to set aside the abatement of deceased defendant Manorama against whom the suit had automatically abated. Key Facts: The suit seeks cancellation of a sale deed and partition. Defendant Manorama died on 19/05/2023. The plaintiffs failed to bring legal representatives on record within 90 days or file an abatement set-aside application within 60 days. The court accepted the plaintiffs' explanation that the defendants' advocate failed to communicate the death, citing natural justice principles to allow the suit to proceed against the deceased's legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ramesh Pandurang Bhagat & Rajani Shamrao Wairagade v. Manorama Shalikram Raut (1300005/2015) Outcome: Application allowed. The court condoned the delay and permitted the plaintiffs to file an application to set aside the abatement of deceased defendant Manorama against whom the suit had automatically abated. Key Facts: The suit seeks cancellation of a sale deed and partition. Defendant Manorama died on 19/05/2023. The plaintiffs failed to bring legal representatives on record within 90 days or file an abatement set-aside application within 60 days. The court accepted the plaintiffs' explanation that the defendants' advocate failed to communicate the death, citing natural justice principles to allow the suit to proceed against the deceased's legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts