Vitthal Ganpat Mahale (Dead)(Legal Heir) vs Sulochana Kisan Khajbhage Advocate - Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas — 50/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020008862018
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
571/2018
Filing Date
02-05-2018
Registration No
50/2018
Registration Date
02-05-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vitthal Ganpat Mahale (Dead)(Legal Heir)
Adv. Vaidya Mahadu Bhagwat1.
Godavari Vitthal Mahale(Legal Heir)
Adv. Poddar1.
Kasabai Ramesh Thakare
Adv. Poddar1.
Venubai Jagannath Wankhede(Legal Heir)
Adv. Poddar1.
Bandu Vitthal Mahale
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas1.
Kalpna Datta Bhoyar
Adv. Poddar1.
Sulochana Bhagvat Thakre
Adv. Poddar1.
Sharda Govinda Borchate
Adv. Poddar1.
Vandana Santosh Dhoble
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Respondent(s)
Sulochana Kisan Khajbhage Advocate - Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Kashiram Deoba Khajbhage(Legal Heir)
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Maroti Tukaram Khajbhage
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Ramkisan Motiram Mahale
Daokabai Motiram Mahale
Jagannath Maroti Khajbhage
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Naib Tahsildar,Wahim (Pardi Takmor Circle) Tq. DIst. Washim
State of Maharashtra through Collector, Washim Tq. Dist. Washim
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Compliance
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 14-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 50/2018 Outcome: The application filed by the plaintiffs (Vitthal Ganpat Mahale's legal heirs and Kasabai Ramesh Thakare) was allowed. The Civil Judge, Washim, permitted the plaintiffs to produce additional documents on record filed with their list of documents. The defendants' opposition was overruled as the court found no prejudice would result from allowing document production. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 50/2018 Outcome: The application filed by the plaintiffs (Vitthal Ganpat Mahale's legal heirs and Kasabai Ramesh Thakare) was allowed. The Civil Judge, Washim, permitted the plaintiffs to produce additional documents on record filed with their list of documents. The defendants' opposition was overruled as the court found no prejudice would result from allowing document production. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts