Tulsabai Govinda Payaghan vs Barku Bahgwat Payaghan Advocate - BELOKAR KISHOR PRABHACHANDRA — 600111/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitForDeclarationandPermanentInjuction. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020002842014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
600224/2014
Filing Date
21-05-2014
Registration No
600111/2014
Registration Date
21-05-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tulsabai Govinda Payaghan
Adv. Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Raju Govinda Payaghan
Adv. C.S. Poddar
Vishwanath Govinda Payaghan
Adv. C.S.Poddar
Shivaji Govinda Payaghan
Adv. C.S.Poddar
Respondent(s)
Barku Bahgwat Payaghan Advocate - BELOKAR KISHOR PRABHACHANDRA
Baban Bhagfwat Payaghan(Legal Heir)
Adv. K.P. Belokar
Jijabai Baban Payaghan
Adv. K.P. Belokar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - R.C.S. No.111/2014 The suit filed by Tulsabai and others against Barku and others has been pending for evidence of the plaintiffs. On 20.04.2023, the plaintiffs and their advocate were absent from court proceedings. The Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Washim, directed the plaintiffs to lead their evidence on the next date without fail, warning that failure to comply would result in necessary orders being passed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - R.C.S. No.111/2014 The suit filed by Tulsabai and others against Barku and others has been pending for evidence of the plaintiffs. On 20.04.2023, the plaintiffs and their advocate were absent from court proceedings. The Joint Civil Judge & Joint Municipal First Class Court, Washim, directed the plaintiffs to lead their evidence on the next date without fail, warning that failure to comply would result in necessary orders being passed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts