Vaishall Gajanan Magar vs Abhijit Dattatrya Wankhede Advocate - Raut Jitendra Rajaram — 19/2024

Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 21. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHWS020002592024

Compliance

Next Hearing

10th July 2026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2024

Filing Number

263/2024

Filing Date

27-03-2024

Registration No

19/2024

Registration Date

27-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Washim

Judge

1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Vaishall Gajanan Magar

Adv. VISHWAKARMA INDRESHKUMAR RAMLAL

Respondent(s)

Abhijit Dattatrya Wankhede Advocate - Raut Jitendra Rajaram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

09-06-2026

Compliance

08-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

16-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

23-01-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

03-01-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

12-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case 19/2024 Summary: The defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" (W.S.) order and file his written statement was allowed with costs of Rs. 1,000. The court found the defendant had been granted ample opportunities to file his written statement over multiple adjournments but failed to do so, citing delay and laches; however, considering the nature of the proceeding, the application was permitted subject to cost compensation to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 19/2024 Summary: The defendant's application to set aside the "no written statement" (W.S.) order and file his written statement was allowed with costs of Rs. 1,000. The court found the defendant had been granted ample opportunities to file his written statement over multiple adjournments but failed to do so, citing delay and laches; however, considering the nature of the proceeding, the application was permitted subject to cost compensation to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case