Shrihari Dattatraya Naik vs State Of Maharashtra Trough Collector — 68/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020002222017
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
226/2017
Filing Date
11-05-2017
Registration No
68/2017
Registration Date
11-05-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shrihari Dattatraya Naik
Adv. BHALEKAR MAHENDRA MOTIRAM
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Trough Collector
Special Land Acquisition Officer and Sub Divisional Officer washim
Adv. GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI
Exective Engineer of M.S.R.D.G. for Samruddhi Express Way Nagpur to Mumbei
Kishor Dattatray Naik
Ravi Uddhavrao Raut
Vaibhav @ Vishal Uddhavrao Raut
Uddhavrao Madhavrao Mule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 23-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 09-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 03-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 68/2017 – Shrihari Dattatray Naik v. State of Maharashtra The case, pending since 2017 (8+ years), was scheduled for plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff and counsel were repeatedly called until 3:30 PM but remained absent without filing adjournment applications, demonstrating lack of interest in conducting the case. The court ordered the suit to be posted for a dismissal order on the next date, rather than immediate dismissal, citing fairness concerns despite the plaintiff's evident abandonment of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 68/2017 – Shrihari Dattatray Naik v. State of Maharashtra The case, pending since 2017 (8+ years), was scheduled for plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff and counsel were repeatedly called until 3:30 PM but remained absent without filing adjournment applications, demonstrating lack of interest in conducting the case. The court ordered the suit to be posted for a dismissal order on the next date, rather than immediate dismissal, citing fairness concerns despite the plaintiff's evident abandonment of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts