Bhagwan Nivrutti Kambale vs Ganesh Pandurang Kharatkar Advocate - Bakliwal Anup Surendrakumar — 53/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Awaiting Report of Commissioner. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020002102021
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
209/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
53/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagwan Nivrutti Kambale
Adv. Ingole Rajesh Kisanrao
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Pandurang Kharatkar Advocate - Bakliwal Anup Surendrakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 13-04-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
| 16-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 27-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 53/2021 - Bhagwan Kambale v. Ganesh Kharatkar The plaintiff's application for appointment of T.I.L.R. (Tahsildar) as Court Commissioner to measure disputed property (Gat No. 408/2) in Washim was allowed. The court appointed T.I.L.R., Washim as Court Commissioner to conduct measurement and boundary demarcation of the suit property, finding such investigation necessary to resolve the encroachment and possession dispute. The plaintiff was directed to bear commission costs and deposit fees directly with the T.I.L.R.'s office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 53/2021 - Bhagwan Kambale v. Ganesh Kharatkar The plaintiff's application for appointment of T.I.L.R. (Tahsildar) as Court Commissioner to measure disputed property (Gat No. 408/2) in Washim was allowed. The court appointed T.I.L.R., Washim as Court Commissioner to conduct measurement and boundary demarcation of the suit property, finding such investigation necessary to resolve the encroachment and possession dispute. The plaintiff was directed to bear commission costs and deposit fees directly with the T.I.L.R.'s office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts