Shakukntalabai Rupchand Jain vs Uttam Gunaji Ghatmal — 9/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHWS020002012019
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
158/2019
Filing Date
05-02-2019
Registration No
9/2019
Registration Date
05-02-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakukntalabai Rupchand Jain
Adv. DHAGADE KANTILAL RAMPAL
Respondent(s)
Uttam Gunaji Ghatmal
Collector Washim.
Z.P. C/o C.E.O. Washim.
Secretary Gram Panchayat Ansing
Sub Disvisional Officer P.W.D. Washim.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Compliance |
| 23-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 07-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-02-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.D. No. 9/2019 (Shakuntalabai Jain v. Uttam Ghatmal & Ors.) The application for possession warrant was partly allowed. The court issued a possession warrant directing the Bailiff to vacate judgment debtor No.1's possession of an encroached tin shed (5 ft. x 4 ft.) on plot No.19, Washim district, in execution of a 2016 appellate judgment. However, the court rejected the prayer to direct public officers (judgment debtors 2-5) to assist, holding they cannot help as they are not police personnel. Judgment debtor No.1 was ordered to pay removal costs to the decree holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.D. No. 9/2019 (Shakuntalabai Jain v. Uttam Ghatmal & Ors.) The application for possession warrant was partly allowed. The court issued a possession warrant directing the Bailiff to vacate judgment debtor No.1's possession of an encroached tin shed (5 ft. x 4 ft.) on plot No.19, Washim district, in execution of a 2016 appellate judgment. However, the court rejected the prayer to direct public officers (judgment debtors 2-5) to assist, holding they cannot help as they are not police personnel. Judgment debtor No.1 was ordered to pay removal costs to the decree holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts