Rukhamaba Jayashig thakur vs Parsharam Ramraj Kevat (Pardeshi) Advocate - BELOAKR RAJESH MANIKRAO — 29/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 09. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020001402020
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
136/2020
Filing Date
24-02-2020
Registration No
29/2020
Registration Date
24-02-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rukhamaba Jayashig thakur
Adv. BERIYA AJAYKUMAR SHANKARLAL
Respondent(s)
Parsharam Ramraj Kevat (Pardeshi) Advocate - BELOAKR RAJESH MANIKRAO
S.D.O. and Land Acqui. Officer Washim.
Collector Washim
Shantabai Mulsing Shekhawat
Subhas Rajaram Kewat
Santosh Rajaram Kewat
Vijay Jagdish Thakur
Bharati Jagdish Thakur
Kirti Jagdish Thakur
Jagdish Shankarsing Thakur
Govind Narayan Sengar
Ranbirsing Narayansing Segar
Vimalbai Kuvarsing Thakur
Rameshvari Barjosing Kachhawa
Kuryarbai Gopalsingh Sangar
Dhanpata Gendasingh Bailkaud
Devkabai Radhesham Thakur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Written Statement
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Written Statement |
| 23-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 30-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 29/2020 Outcome: Application allowed. The 2nd Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Washim granted defendant No. 1's application to produce certified copies of 7/12 extract of Gat No. 42, village Medashi, Malegaon, Washim district. The court found the proposed documents relevant to the suit and allowed their production despite the plaintiff's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 29/2020 Outcome: Application allowed. The 2nd Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Washim granted defendant No. 1's application to produce certified copies of 7/12 extract of Gat No. 42, village Medashi, Malegaon, Washim district. The court found the proposed documents relevant to the suit and allowed their production despite the plaintiff's opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts