Ramdas Narayan Tale vs District Collector Washim — 20/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS020001122025

e-Filing Number

18-01-2025

Filing Number

113/2025

Filing Date

28-Jan-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

28-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Washim

Judge

1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramdas Narayan Tale

    Adv. WANKHEDE DILIP SOPAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.District Collector Washim

  2. 2.Sub Divisional Officer Washim

  3. 3.Tahsildar

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  10. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Washim

  12. 07-May-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of peaceful possession over the suit land, lacking substantial documentary evidence and affidavits from neighboring farmers to support his cultivation claims since 2009. Consequently, the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 07-May-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Washim

  14. 05-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Washim

  15. 28-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Washim

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim

  17. 15-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim

  18. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 28-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of peaceful possession over the suit land, lacking substantial documentary evidence and affidavits from neighboring farmers to support his cultivation claims since 2009. Consequently, the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case