Ramdas Narayan Tale vs District Collector Washim — 20/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020001122025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-01-2025
Filing Number
113/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramdas Narayan Tale
Adv. WANKHEDE DILIP SOPAN
Respondent(s)
District Collector Washim
Sub Divisional Officer Washim
Tahsildar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of peaceful possession over the suit land, lacking substantial documentary evidence and affidavits from neighboring farmers to support his cultivation claims since 2009. Consequently, the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 20/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of peaceful possession over the suit land, lacking substantial documentary evidence and affidavits from neighboring farmers to support his cultivation claims since 2009. Consequently, the balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff, and no irreparable loss would result from denying the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts