Tukaram Jayram Ingole (Dead)(Legal Heir) vs Nimba Jayram Ingole — 23/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS020000892022
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
91/2022
Filing Date
03-02-2022
Registration No
23/2022
Registration Date
03-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Washim
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tukaram Jayram Ingole (Dead)(Legal Heir)
Adv. Kambale Anil N.1.
Kisan Tukaram Ingole
Adv. Kambale A. N.
Respondent(s)
Nimba Jayram Ingole
Sambha Jayram Ingole
Champat Zabuji Ingole
Madhav Zabuji Ingole
Laxmibai Janardan Kamble
Shakuntala Alias Sakhubai Sudhnawa Wankhade
Ramabai Babulal Bhagat
Nandabai Madhukar Labade
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr. Dn. Washim.
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 25-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 09-02-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. NO. 23/2022 The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a partition suit was allowed. The court permitted: (1) substitution of defendant No.8's name from "Nandabai Madhukar Labde" to "Nanda Madan Waghmare" to reflect her remarriage, and (2) impleading the Collector of Washim as defendant No.13. The court found the amendment bona fide, necessary to determine the real controversy, and caused no prejudice to defendants. The plaintiff was directed to execute amendments and supply copies of the amended plaint by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. NO. 23/2022 The plaintiff's application to amend the plaint in a partition suit was allowed. The court permitted: (1) substitution of defendant No.8's name from "Nandabai Madhukar Labde" to "Nanda Madan Waghmare" to reflect her remarriage, and (2) impleading the Collector of Washim as defendant No.13. The court found the amendment bona fide, necessary to determine the real controversy, and caused no prejudice to defendants. The plaintiff was directed to execute amendments and supply copies of the amended plaint by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts