Gajanan Hanuman Gote vs Ukandi Ganpat Gardane Advocate - Nene Ashish Narayan — 61/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010019442019
Filing Number
1006/2019
Filing Date
22-Oct-2019
Registration No
61/2019
Registration Date
22-Oct-2019
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gajanan Hanuman Gote
Adv. Gaikwad Gouttam Kisan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ukandi Ganpat Gardane Advocate - Nene Ashish Narayan
-
2.Navnath Sopan Gote
-
3.Atmaram Shrriram Gote
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Gajanan Hanuman Gote v. Ukandi Ganpat Gardane & Others (61/2019) The appellate court partially allowed Gajanan's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his land encroachment suit. Finding critical defects in the government surveyor's measurement—including failure to measure all relevant survey numbers, absence of permanent boundary marks, and lack of proper service of notices—the court held that re-measurement was the appropriate remedy rather than dismissal. The court set aside the trial judgment and remanded the case with detailed directions for a court-appointed commissioner to conduct a fresh, comprehensive measurement showing actual holdings, boundaries, and alleged encroachment areas, after which the trial court shall decide the dispute on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
12-Jan-2026
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Dec-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Nov-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
14-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
31-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Oct-2025
Arguments
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Sep-2025
Arguments
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Sep-2025
Arguments
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
14-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
10-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
17-Mar-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
11-Feb-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
22-Jan-2025
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Nov-2024
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Sep-2024
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
07-Aug-2024
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Jul-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Jun-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
05-Apr-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Mar-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
23-Feb-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Feb-2024
Ex_Party Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
19-Dec-2023
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
07-Nov-2023
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Sep-2023
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
23-Aug-2023
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Jul-2023
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
05-Jun-2023
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
27-Mar-2023
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Jan-2023
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
23-Nov-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Sep-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
18-Aug-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Jun-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Apr-2022
R and P Ready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
19-Mar-2022
R and P Ready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
09-Feb-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Jan-2022
R and P Ready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Nov-2021
Order
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
29-Oct-2021
Order
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
25-Sep-2021
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Aug-2021
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Jun-2021
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Apr-2021
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
24-Mar-2021
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
11-Feb-2021
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
05-Jan-2021
Steps
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
25-Nov-2020
Steps
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Oct-2020
Steps
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
05-Sep-2020
Steps
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Jul-2020
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Jun-2020
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
17-Apr-2020
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
27-Feb-2020
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Jan-2020
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Nov-2019
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
23-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 61/2019
Case Summary: Gajanan Hanuman Gote v. Ukandi Ganpat Gardane & Others (61/2019) The appellate court partially allowed Gajanan's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his land encroachment suit. Finding critical defects in the government surveyor's measurement—including failure to measure all relevant survey numbers, absence of permanent boundary marks, and lack of proper service of notices—the court held that re-measurement was the appropriate remedy rather than dismissal. The court set aside the trial judgment and remanded the case with detailed directions for a court-appointed commissioner to conduct a fresh, comprehensive measurement showing actual holdings, boundaries, and alleged encroachment areas, after which the trial court shall decide the dispute on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts