Raju Ranu Rayaliwale vs Sub Divisional Officer And Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH — 420/2022
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS010019322022
Filing Number
1102/2022
Filing Date
02-Dec-2022
Registration No
420/2022
Registration Date
02-Dec-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju Ranu Rayaliwale
Adv. R. N. Lathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sub Divisional Officer And Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH
-
2.Project Director, National Highways Authority of India , Unit Washim
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
31-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
17-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Feb-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Jan-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Dec-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Nov-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
26-Aug-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Jun-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
20-Apr-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
02-Dec-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
06-Oct-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
25-Aug-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
17-Jul-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary In Civil M.A. No. 420/2022, the Principal District Judge of Washim set aside the ex-parte order passed against respondent no. 1 (Sub Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer Washim). The court allowed respondent no. 1 to participate in the proceedings, holding that justice requires providing a fair and reasonable opportunity to the respondent to be heard before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-May-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Mar-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Feb-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 420/2022
Summary In Civil M.A. No. 420/2022, the Principal District Judge of Washim set aside the ex-parte order passed against respondent no. 1 (Sub Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer Washim). The court allowed respondent no. 1 to participate in the proceedings, holding that justice requires providing a fair and reasonable opportunity to the respondent to be heard before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts