Jumma Rannu Rayaliwale vs Sub Divisional Officer And Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH — 418/2022
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th August 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS010019302022
Filing Number
1100/2022
Filing Date
02-Dec-2022
Registration No
418/2022
Registration Date
02-Dec-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Last updated 28-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jumma Rannu Rayaliwale
Adv. R. N. Lathi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sub Divisional Officer And Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH
-
2.Project Director, National Highways Authority of India , Unit Washim
Case History
-
12-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
20-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
31-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
25-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Feb-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Jan-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
09-Dec-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Nov-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-Oct-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
26-Aug-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Jun-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
20-Apr-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Feb-2024
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
15-Dec-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
19-Oct-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
19-Aug-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
27-Jul-2023
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
26-Jun-2023
No Say Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
06-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary - Civil M.A. No. 418/2022 The Principal District Judge, Washim set aside the ex-parte order previously passed against the Sub Divisional Officer (respondent no. 1) and permitted him to participate in the proceedings. The court found that interests of justice required granting respondent no. 1 a fair and reasonable opportunity to be heard before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jun-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
04-May-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Mar-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Feb-2023
Reply/Say
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
07-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 418/2022
Case Summary - Civil M.A. No. 418/2022 The Principal District Judge, Washim set aside the ex-parte order previously passed against the Sub Divisional Officer (respondent no. 1) and permitted him to participate in the proceedings. The court found that interests of justice required granting respondent no. 1 a fair and reasonable opportunity to be heard before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts