Bhagwat Dnyanba Navghare vs Sushilabai Shankar Jadhav (Koche) — 78/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010016542022
Filing Number
900/2022
Filing Date
20-Oct-2022
Registration No
78/2022
Registration Date
20-Oct-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhagwat Dnyanba Navghare
Adv. Gawali Ravindra Shamrao
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sushilabai Shankar Jadhav (Koche)
-
2.Datta Shankar Jadhav (Koche)
-
3.Digambar Shankar Jadhav (Koche)
-
4.Rekha Bhagwat Ambhore
-
5.Eknath Dnyanba Kavar
-
6.Kailash Dnaynba Kavar
-
7.Bhaurao Chinku Muthal
-
8.Kishor Namdeorao Wankhede
-
9.Vijay Digambar Awate
-
10.Shailesh Kondiram Pardhe
-
11.Deputy Superintendent of land record and Enquiry officer Zodga bk
-
12.State of Maharashtra Through Collector Washim
-
13.Tahsildar, Malegaon
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 78/2022: Bhagwat Dnyanba Navghare v. Sushilabai Shankar Jadhav The Principal District Judge, Washim, partly allowed the appellant's appeal regarding disputed agricultural land affected by a faulty land consolidation scheme. The court affirmed the trial court's declaration that the appellant owns the suit property but corrected an error by also declaring that a 2015 sale deed is not binding on the appellant regarding the disputed property, as the defendant failed to contest the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
05-May-2026
Judgment
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
23-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
30-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting Notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
10-Feb-2026
Steps_Unready
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
-
24-Dec-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Nov-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Sep-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Aug-2025
Steps
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Jun-2025
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
22-Apr-2025
Awaiting Notice
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
27-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Feb-2025
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Jan-2025
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
11-Nov-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Oct-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
24-Sep-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Aug-2024
Dismissal Order
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Jul-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Mar-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
16-Feb-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Jan-2024
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
24-Nov-2023
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Oct-2023
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Sep-2023
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Jul-2023
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Jun-2023
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Apr-2023
Awaiting Notice
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
08-Feb-2023
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
07-Jan-2023
Awaiting Notice
-
20-Dec-2022
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
25-Nov-2022
Notice_Unready
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 78/2022
Summary of Case 78/2022: Bhagwat Dnyanba Navghare v. Sushilabai Shankar Jadhav The Principal District Judge, Washim, partly allowed the appellant's appeal regarding disputed agricultural land affected by a faulty land consolidation scheme. The court affirmed the trial court's declaration that the appellant owns the suit property but corrected an error by also declaring that a 2015 sale deed is not binding on the appellant regarding the disputed property, as the defendant failed to contest the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts