Prakash Pandurang Thakare vs Santosh Kisan Thakare Advocate - Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas — 54/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43,Rule1(r),Order43,Rule5. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010016302023
e-Filing Number
21-11-2023
Filing Number
1069/2023
Filing Date
21-11-2023
Registration No
54/2023
Registration Date
23-11-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prakash Pandurang Thakare
Adv. NIKAM NANDKISHOR MANIKRAO
Gajanan Pandurang Thakare
Adv. NIKAM NANDKISHOR MANIKRAO
Tryambak Kisan Thakare
Adv. NIKAM NANDKISHOR MANIKRAO
Ananda Tryambak Thakare
Adv. NIKAM NANDKISHOR MANIKRAO
Ramdas Tryambak Thakare
Adv. NIKAM NANDKISHOR MANIKRAO
Respondent(s)
Santosh Kisan Thakare Advocate - Poddar Chandrashekhar Shriniwas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Prakash Pandurang Thakare v. Santosh Kisan Thakare (54/2023) The Principal District Judge, Washim partly allowed the appellants' appeal against an interim relief order, finding that the trial court failed to consider replies filed by defendants 2, 5, and 7 before granting temporary injunction in an encroachment dispute. The court set aside the lower court's order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing with proper consideration of all defendants' replies and potential court-commissioned joint measurement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prakash Pandurang Thakare v. Santosh Kisan Thakare (54/2023) The Principal District Judge, Washim partly allowed the appellants' appeal against an interim relief order, finding that the trial court failed to consider replies filed by defendants 2, 5, and 7 before granting temporary injunction in an encroachment dispute. The court set aside the lower court's order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing with proper consideration of all defendants' replies and potential court-commissioned joint measurement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts