Ashok Pralhad Dandade vs Leelabai Ashok Dandade Advocate - INGOLE MURLIDHAR DATTA — 38/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 22nd May 2026.
Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application
CNR: MHWS010015972022
Filing Number
752/2022
Filing Date
04-10-2022
Registration No
38/2022
Registration Date
04-10-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Pralhad Dandade
Adv. Shaikh Zahir Gafoor
Respondent(s)
Leelabai Ashok Dandade Advocate - INGOLE MURLIDHAR DATTA
Seema Ashok Dandade
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-05-2026 | Order |
| 16-05-2026 | Order |
| 14-05-2026 | Order |
| 29-04-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed Ashok Pralhad Dandade's revision petition challenging the lower court's order that partially set aside the 1995 maintenance judgment. The court upheld maintenance for Leelabai (Rs. 400/month) while setting aside it for their daughter Seema, finding that Ashok failed to prove Leelabai's income from the transferred agricultural land or that the Rs. 35,000 bank deposit was made, and noting Ashok's sufficient pension income justified continued maintenance despite the alleged 1997 settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed Ashok Pralhad Dandade's revision petition challenging the lower court's order that partially set aside the 1995 maintenance judgment. The court upheld maintenance for Leelabai (Rs. 400/month) while setting aside it for their daughter Seema, finding that Ashok failed to prove Leelabai's income from the transferred agricultural land or that the Rs. 35,000 bank deposit was made, and noting Ashok's sufficient pension income justified continued maintenance despite the alleged 1997 settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts