Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd vs Maroti Aatmaram Khandagale — 405/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 28th April 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHWS010013112019
Filing Number
698/2019
Filing Date
13-Aug-2019
Registration No
405/2019
Registration Date
13-Aug-2019
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd
Adv. CHANDANI RAKESH GORDHANDAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maroti Aatmaram Khandagale
-
2.Pratap Devidas Gawali
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The District Judge dismissed Shriram Transport Finance's execution application for default on 28/04/2026, finding that the respondents (Maroti Aatmaram Khandagale and Pratap Devidas Gawali) and their advocate were repeatedly absent and showed no interest in the proceedings despite the case pending over 7 years. Citing Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose matters older than 5 years, the court concluded that no purpose would be served by further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Feb-2026
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
10-Dec-2025
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
15-Nov-2025
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
17-Oct-2025
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
02-Sep-2025
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
11-Aug-2025
Awaiting Warrant
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
19-Jun-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
17-Apr-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
22-Jan-2025
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
18-Nov-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Jul-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Apr-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
24-Jan-2024
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Nov-2023
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
19-Aug-2023
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Jun-2023
Appearance
Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Mar-2023
Appearance
-
18-Jan-2023
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
12-Nov-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
31-Oct-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
17-Aug-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
27-Jun-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
07-May-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Apr-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
15-Feb-2022
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
26-Nov-2021
Appearance
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Sep-2021
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
22-Jun-2021
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
18-Mar-2021
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
19-Dec-2020
Steps
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
23-Sep-2020
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
06-Jul-2020
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
18-Mar-2020
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
08-Feb-2020
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
16-Jan-2020
Notice_Unready
Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim
-
23-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 405/2019
The District Judge dismissed Shriram Transport Finance's execution application for default on 28/04/2026, finding that the respondents (Maroti Aatmaram Khandagale and Pratap Devidas Gawali) and their advocate were repeatedly absent and showed no interest in the proceedings despite the case pending over 7 years. Citing Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose matters older than 5 years, the court concluded that no purpose would be served by further delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts