State of Maharashtra through PSO Shirpur vs Rahul Arun Mule — 141/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75(2)75(3),78(2),351(3). Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act
CNR: MHWS010012852025
Filing Number
763/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
141/2025
Registration Date
23-Dec-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
12-District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
492
Police Station
SHIRPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Shirpur
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rahul Arun Mule
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
List of Witness
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
24-Apr-2026
Charge
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
07-Apr-2026
Charge
District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 141/2025 Summary: Rahul Arun Mule's application for discharge under Section 250 BNSS 2023 was rejected. The accused was charged with outraging the modesty of a minor victim under sections 75(2), 75(3), 78(2), 351(3) BNS and sections 8, 12 POCSO Act. The court found sufficient material evidence in the charge-sheet and specific FIR allegations to proceed against the accused, dismissing arguments of false implication and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Mar-2026
Charge
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
13-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
08-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
05-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim
-
23-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 141/2025
Case 141/2025 Summary: Rahul Arun Mule's application for discharge under Section 250 BNSS 2023 was rejected. The accused was charged with outraging the modesty of a minor victim under sections 75(2), 75(3), 78(2), 351(3) BNS and sections 8, 12 POCSO Act. The court found sufficient material evidence in the charge-sheet and specific FIR allegations to proceed against the accused, dismissing arguments of false implication and lack of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts