Eknath Laxman Khodke vs Narayan Ganpati Khodke — 42/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010012782024
e-Filing Number
08-11-2024
Filing Number
765/2024
Filing Date
12-Nov-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
13-Nov-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Eknath Laxman Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
-
2.Kailas Eknath Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
-
3.Gajanan Eknath Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narayan Ganpati Khodke
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
02-May-2026
Judgment
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
14-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
10-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
08-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
06-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
03-Jul-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
07-May-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
04-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
22-Jan-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
21-Dec-2024
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim
-
14-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2024
CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts