Eknath Laxman Khodke vs Narayan Ganpati Khodke — 42/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHWS010012782024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

08-11-2024

Filing Number

765/2024

Filing Date

12-11-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

13-11-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96

Petitioner(s)

Eknath Laxman Khodke

Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM

Kailas Eknath Khodke

Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM

Gajanan Eknath Khodke

Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM

Respondent(s)

Narayan Ganpati Khodke

Hearing History

Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim

06-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

Judgment

28-04-2026

Judgment

16-04-2026

Arguments

08-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case