Eknath Laxman Khodke vs Narayan Ganpati Khodke — 42/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010012782024
e-Filing Number
08-11-2024
Filing Number
765/2024
Filing Date
12-11-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
13-11-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Eknath Laxman Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Kailas Eknath Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Gajanan Eknath Khodke
Adv. HIWRALE RITESH ATMARAM
Respondent(s)
Narayan Ganpati Khodke
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Regular Civil Appeal No. 42/2024 The District Judge dismissed the appellants' appeal and upheld the lower court's decree granting Narayan Ganpati Khodke a permanent injunction against Eknath Laxman Khodke and his brothers. The court found that Khodke's registered sale-deed (dated 13/04/1972) and revenue records conclusively established his ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Dhodap village, Washim district. The appellants' counterclaim that the property was purchased from joint family income and given to them through oral partition lacked supporting evidence. The court held that the appellants' assertion of possession and their challenge to Khodke's rights constituted obstruction, warranting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts