State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod vs Albar Aarib Najim Ahamad — 140/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75,78. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act

CNR: MHWS010012742025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

757/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

140/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

FIR Details

FIR Number

790

Police Station

RISOD

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75,78
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod

Respondent(s)

Albar Aarib Najim Ahamad

Hearing History

Judge: 12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim

03-06-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-05-2026

Evidence

24-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

02-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 140/2025 Summary: Albar Arib Najim Ahamad's regular bail application was granted. Arrested by Risod police for alleged sexual offences against a minor under BNS sections 75-78 and POCSO Act 2012, the court found that since investigation was completed and chargesheet filed, bail could be granted. The accused was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, on condition that he attend court regularly, not tamper with evidence, avoid the victim's vicinity, and maintain no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 140/2025 Summary: Albar Arib Najim Ahamad's regular bail application was granted. Arrested by Risod police for alleged sexual offences against a minor under BNS sections 75-78 and POCSO Act 2012, the court found that since investigation was completed and chargesheet filed, bail could be granted. The accused was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, on condition that he attend court regularly, not tamper with evidence, avoid the victim's vicinity, and maintain no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court, Washim All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case