State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod vs Albar Aarib Najim Ahamad — 140/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 75,78. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act
CNR: MHWS010012742025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
757/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
140/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
790
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Respondent(s)
Albar Aarib Najim Ahamad
Hearing History
Judge: 12-District Judge 3 and ASJ, Washim
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 140/2025 Summary: Albar Arib Najim Ahamad's regular bail application was granted. Arrested by Risod police for alleged sexual offences against a minor under BNS sections 75-78 and POCSO Act 2012, the court found that since investigation was completed and chargesheet filed, bail could be granted. The accused was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, on condition that he attend court regularly, not tamper with evidence, avoid the victim's vicinity, and maintain no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 140/2025 Summary: Albar Arib Najim Ahamad's regular bail application was granted. Arrested by Risod police for alleged sexual offences against a minor under BNS sections 75-78 and POCSO Act 2012, the court found that since investigation was completed and chargesheet filed, bail could be granted. The accused was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety, on condition that he attend court regularly, not tamper with evidence, avoid the victim's vicinity, and maintain no contact with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts