Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Badrinarayan Gyanaba Ghuge — 209/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHWS010012332018
Filing Number
522/2018
Filing Date
11-12-2018
Registration No
209/2018
Registration Date
11-12-2018
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
Adv. BHALEKAR MAHENDRA MOTIRAM
Respondent(s)
Badrinarayan Gyanaba Ghuge
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 22-12-2025 | Notice_Unready |
| 11-11-2025 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the execution application (Darkhast proceeding) filed by respondent Badrinarayan Gyanaba Ghuge for default on 16/03/2026. The court found that the respondent and his advocate were repeatedly absent, and the execution application had been pending for over 5 years without effective steps taken for implementation, indicating lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of cases pending over 5 years, the court dismissed the proceeding as serving no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the execution application (Darkhast proceeding) filed by respondent Badrinarayan Gyanaba Ghuge for default on 16/03/2026. The court found that the respondent and his advocate were repeatedly absent, and the execution application had been pending for over 5 years without effective steps taken for implementation, indicating lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of cases pending over 5 years, the court dismissed the proceeding as serving no useful purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts