Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Yogesh Kailash Jagtap — 190/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHWS010011932018
Filing Number
494/2018
Filing Date
03-12-2018
Registration No
190/2018
Registration Date
05-12-2018
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
Adv. BHALEKAR MAHENDRA MOTIRAM
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Kailash Jagtap
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 16-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 24-12-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
| 13-11-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. v. Yogesh Kailash Jagtap (190/2018) The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed the execution application for default on 16/03/2026. The court found that the defendant (DH) and their advocate were repeatedly absent, and no effective steps were taken to execute the decree over more than 5 years, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of matters pending over 5 years, the court dismissed the Darkhast proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. v. Yogesh Kailash Jagtap (190/2018) The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed the execution application for default on 16/03/2026. The court found that the defendant (DH) and their advocate were repeatedly absent, and no effective steps were taken to execute the decree over more than 5 years, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of matters pending over 5 years, the court dismissed the Darkhast proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts