Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Nitin Shivashankar Jiravankar — 184/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHWS010011872018
Filing Number
488/2018
Filing Date
22-11-2018
Registration No
184/2018
Registration Date
05-12-2018
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
Adv. BHALEKAR MAHENDRA MOTIRAM
Respondent(s)
Nitin Shivashankar Jiravankar
Bebi Shivashankar Jiravankar
Sudhir Ramchandra Jawanjale
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 13-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 15-11-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution application for default on 16/03/2026, finding that the respondents and their advocate were repeatedly absent and no effective steps had been taken to execute the decree over more than 5 years. The court cited Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of matters pending over 5 years, concluding that continuing the proceedings served no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim dismissed Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.'s execution application for default on 16/03/2026, finding that the respondents and their advocate were repeatedly absent and no effective steps had been taken to execute the decree over more than 5 years. The court cited Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to expeditiously dispose of matters pending over 5 years, concluding that continuing the proceedings served no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts