Vidya Vijay Bharti vs Ab Karim Moh Hatam — 41/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43, Rule 5. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHWS010011852024
e-Filing Number
19-10-2024
Filing Number
713/2024
Filing Date
19-10-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
22-10-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vidya Vijay Bharti
Adv. B.D.Pandit
Vijay Parasram Bharti
Adv. B.D.Pandit
Respondent(s)
Ab Karim Moh Hatam
Abdul Rafeek Abdul Munaf
Gajanan Gulab Puri
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vidya Vijay Bharti v. Ab Karim Moh Hatam (41/2024) The District Judge partially allowed the appeal and granted the temporary injunction application that the lower court had rejected. The plaintiffs sold agricultural land for Rs. 24.68 lakh with Rs. 6 lakh paid upfront and balance via cheques; when cheques were dishonored with "stop payment," they sought to cancel the sale deed. The appellate court found plaintiffs established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored them, restraining defendants from alienating 0.61R of the suit property until final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Vidya Vijay Bharti v. Ab Karim Moh Hatam (41/2024) The District Judge partially allowed the appeal and granted the temporary injunction application that the lower court had rejected. The plaintiffs sold agricultural land for Rs. 24.68 lakh with Rs. 6 lakh paid upfront and balance via cheques; when cheques were dishonored with "stop payment," they sought to cancel the sale deed. The appellate court found plaintiffs established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored them, restraining defendants from alienating 0.61R of the suit property until final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts