State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City vs Mukesh Bablu Raju Gaikwad Advocate - PATHAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA — 81/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,132,189(2),189(4),190,191(2)(3),223,49. Status: Stayed by Honble High Court. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010011692025
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
714/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
81/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
638
Police Station
WASHIM CITY
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through P.S.O.P.S. Washim City
Respondent(s)
Mukesh Bablu Raju Gaikwad Advocate - PATHAK PRAMOD BHALCHANDRA
Vicky Raju Gaikwad
Rushikesh Suresh Kamble
Rohit Mahadev Tupsundar
Vicky @ Pravin Kailas Ghuge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
Stayed by Honble High Court
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 18-04-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 16-03-2026 | Stayed by Honble High Court |
| 02-03-2026 | Charge |
| 16-02-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 81/2025 Outcome: The Sessions Judge rejected accused Vikky @ Pravin Kailas Ghuge's application for discharge under Section 109 BNS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of intention to kill based on the complainant's allegations of express threats followed by knife assault during a procession duty. The prosecution was directed to furnish draft charges, and the trial will proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Trial No. 81/2025 Outcome: The Sessions Judge rejected accused Vikky @ Pravin Kailas Ghuge's application for discharge under Section 109 BNS, 2023. The court found prima facie evidence of intention to kill based on the complainant's allegations of express threats followed by knife assault during a procession duty. The prosecution was directed to furnish draft charges, and the trial will proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts