Kamlakar Balaji Murlidhar vs Digambar Balaji Murlidhar — 500051/2015
Case under Public Trusts Act (maharashtra) Section 72. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 08th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS010011432015
Filing Number
500414/2015
Filing Date
17-10-2015
Registration No
500051/2015
Registration Date
17-10-2015
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamlakar Balaji Murlidhar
Adv. SAWARKAR PRASHANT KRUSHNARAO
Vinod Kamlakar Murlidhar
Pramod Kamlakar Murlidhar
Respondent(s)
Digambar Balaji Murlidhar
Laxmikant Balaji Murlidhar
Smt Hema Anantrao Shastri
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 500051/2015 The District Court of Washim allowed the appeal and modified the Assistant Charity Commissioner's scheme-framing order for Shri Murlidhar Maharaj Sansthan. The court held that while the scheme was validly framed under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, the delegation of trustee appointment powers to the Inspector was illegal, as scheme-framing and trustee appointment are exclusive judicial functions of the Assistant/Deputy Charity Commissioner under Sections 47, 50-A, and 68 of the Act. The court directed the Assistant Charity Commissioner to personally conduct the trustee appointment inquiry with proper procedure and hearing to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 500051/2015 The District Court of Washim allowed the appeal and modified the Assistant Charity Commissioner's scheme-framing order for Shri Murlidhar Maharaj Sansthan. The court held that while the scheme was validly framed under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, the delegation of trustee appointment powers to the Inspector was illegal, as scheme-framing and trustee appointment are exclusive judicial functions of the Assistant/Deputy Charity Commissioner under Sections 47, 50-A, and 68 of the Act. The court directed the Assistant Charity Commissioner to personally conduct the trustee appointment inquiry with proper procedure and hearing to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts