Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Sudhakar Tukaram Gore Advocate - VISHWAKARMA INDRESHKUMAR RAMLAL — 168/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast

CNR: MHWS010011312018

Filing Number

462/2018

Filing Date

21-Nov-2018

Registration No

168/2018

Registration Date

16-Nov-2018

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

6-District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.

    Adv. BHALEKAR MAHENDRA MOTIRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakar Tukaram Gore Advocate - VISHWAKARMA INDRESHKUMAR RAMLAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the execution application (Darkhast proceeding) filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. for default on 16/03/2026. The District Judge found that the respondent (DH) and their advocate were repeatedly absent and had taken no effective steps to execute the decree despite the application being pending for over 5 years, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to speedily dispose of cases pending over 5 years, the court deemed no purpose would be served by further delay and accordingly dismissed the proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  9. 14-Aug-2025

    Notice_Unready

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  10. 18-Jun-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  13. 01-Jan-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  14. 05-Nov-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  15. 20-Sep-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  16. 30-Jul-2024

    Steps

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  17. 05-Apr-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  18. 07-Feb-2024

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  19. 21-Nov-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  20. 13-Sep-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  21. 24-Jul-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  22. 13-Mar-2023

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  23. 07-Dec-2022

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  24. 14-Sep-2022

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  25. 20-Jun-2022

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  26. 21-Mar-2022

    Reply/Say

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  27. 09-Feb-2022

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  28. 29-Dec-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  29. 15-Nov-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  30. 24-Sep-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  31. 06-Aug-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  32. 11-Jun-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  33. 25-Mar-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  34. 10-Feb-2021

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  35. 21-Dec-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  36. 12-Dec-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  37. 10-Nov-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  38. 30-Sep-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  39. 21-Aug-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  40. 08-Jul-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  41. 28-Apr-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  42. 02-Mar-2020

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  43. 17-Dec-2019

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  44. 09-Oct-2019

    First Order

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  45. 07-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 21-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the execution application (Darkhast proceeding) filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. for default on 16/03/2026. The District Judge found that the respondent (DH) and their advocate were repeatedly absent and had taken no effective steps to execute the decree despite the application being pending for over 5 years, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Following Supreme Court and Bombay High Court directions to speedily dispose of cases pending over 5 years, the court deemed no purpose would be served by further delay and accordingly dismissed the proceeding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case