State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod vs Ashru Kisan Dhavade Advocate - TIFANE VAIBHAV MANIKARV — 94/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,143,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHWS010010182021

Filing Number

538/2021

Filing Date

16-Sep-2021

Registration No

94/2021

Registration Date

16-Sep-2021

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

RISOD

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,143,147,148,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod

    Adv. VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashru Kisan Dhavade Advocate - TIFANE VAIBHAV MANIKARV

  2. 2.Santosh Shivnarayan Dhavade

  3. 3.Gajanan Kisan Dhavade

  4. 4.Shivnarayan Kisan Dhavade

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashru Kisan Dhawade (2026) Decision: All four accused were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 r/w 34 (attempt to murder and rioting). The Sessions Court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused assaulted the complainants or committed any offense. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed because the two injured victims (the complainant and his brother) retracted their allegations during trial, claiming cattle stampede caused the injuries instead. No independent witnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative despite the complaint mentioning numerous bystanders and shopkeepers. The court also noted suspicious procedural irregularities—approximately 12 panchnamas were conducted with identical witnesses, creating credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  5. 30-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  6. 15-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  7. 14-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  8. 04-May-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  9. 20-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  10. 13-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  11. 04-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  13. 16-Mar-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  14. 20-Feb-2026

    List of Witness

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  15. 27-Jan-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  17. 10-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  18. 25-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  19. 30-Oct-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  20. 04-Oct-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  21. 08-Sep-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  22. 04-Aug-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  23. 09-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  24. 17-Mar-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  25. 17-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  26. 15-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  27. 19-Sep-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  28. 09-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  29. 29-Jun-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  30. 13-May-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  31. 15-Mar-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  32. 07-Feb-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  33. 11-Jan-2024

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-1 Asj Washim

  34. 13-Sep-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  35. 05-Jul-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  36. 08-Mar-2023

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  37. 15-Dec-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  38. 15-Nov-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  39. 15-Oct-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  40. 15-Sep-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  41. 25-Aug-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  42. 25-Jul-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  43. 08-Jul-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  44. 22-Jun-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  45. 08-Jun-2022

    Charge

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  46. 07-Apr-2022

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  47. 10-Mar-2022

    Charge

    Ad-hoc Dj-2 and Asj, Washim

  48. 11-Feb-2022

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  49. 28-Dec-2021

    Order

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  50. 22-Nov-2021

    Appearance

    District Judge-1 and Asj, Washim

  51. 29-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 16-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 94/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashru Kisan Dhawade (2026) Decision: All four accused were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 r/w 34 (attempt to murder and rioting). The Sessions Court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused assaulted the complainants or committed any offense. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed because the two injured victims (the complainant and his brother) retracted their allegations during trial, claiming cattle stampede caused the injuries instead. No independent witnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative despite the complaint mentioning numerous bystanders and shopkeepers. The court also noted suspicious procedural irregularities—approximately 12 panchnamas were conducted with identical witnesses, creating credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case