State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod vs Ashru Kisan Dhavade Advocate - TIFANE VAIBHAV MANIKARV — 94/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,143,147,148,149. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010010182021
Filing Number
538/2021
Filing Date
16-09-2021
Registration No
94/2021
Registration Date
16-09-2021
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Decision Date
10th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod
Adv. VYAWAHARE ABHIJIT RAGHUNATH
Respondent(s)
Ashru Kisan Dhavade Advocate - TIFANE VAIBHAV MANIKARV
Santosh Shivnarayan Dhavade
Gajanan Kisan Dhavade
Shivnarayan Kisan Dhavade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-06-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 30-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 15-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashru Kisan Dhawade (2026) Decision: All four accused were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 r/w 34 (attempt to murder and rioting). The Sessions Court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused assaulted the complainants or committed any offense. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed because the two injured victims (the complainant and his brother) retracted their allegations during trial, claiming cattle stampede caused the injuries instead. No independent witnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative despite the complaint mentioning numerous bystanders and shopkeepers. The court also noted suspicious procedural irregularities—approximately 12 panchnamas were conducted with identical witnesses, creating credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ashru Kisan Dhawade (2026) Decision: All four accused were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, 149 r/w 34 (attempt to murder and rioting). The Sessions Court found insufficient evidence to establish that the accused assaulted the complainants or committed any offense. Key Reasoning: The prosecution's case collapsed because the two injured victims (the complainant and his brother) retracted their allegations during trial, claiming cattle stampede caused the injuries instead. No independent witnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative despite the complaint mentioning numerous bystanders and shopkeepers. The court also noted suspicious procedural irregularities—approximately 12 panchnamas were conducted with identical witnesses, creating credibility concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts