Bhagwan Chandrabhan Borchate vs Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - KALOO SHRIRAM NARAYANRAO — 102/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS010010082022

Filing Number

513/2022

Filing Date

13-Jul-2022

Registration No

102/2022

Registration Date

13-Jul-2022

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhagwan Chandrabhan Borchate

    Adv. R.N. Lathi

  2. 2.Sushilabai Bhagwan Borchate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer Washim Advocate - KALOO SHRIRAM NARAYANRAO

  2. 2.National Highway Authority through Project Officer NHAI Unit Washim

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  3. 02-May-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  12. 07-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  19. 31-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  20. 16-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  21. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  22. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  23. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  24. 27-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  26. 21-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  27. 21-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  28. 01-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  29. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  30. 07-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  31. 09-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  32. 11-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  33. 15-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  34. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  35. 26-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  36. 19-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  37. 15-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  38. 20-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  39. 14-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  40. 16-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  41. 02-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  42. 06-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  43. 24-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  44. 18-Jul-2023

    No Say Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  45. 14-Jun-2023

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  46. 18-Apr-2023

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  47. 06-Mar-2023

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  48. 30-Jan-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary – MCA 102/2022 The Principal District Judge Washim set aside an ex-parte order against respondent no. 1 (Sub-Divisional Officer) dated 30/01/2023. Respondent no. 1 had requested recusal of the ex-parte order, which the applicants opposed. The court granted the request, holding that interests of justice require respondent no. 1 be given fair opportunity to participate in proceedings before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  49. 30-Jan-2023

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  50. 09-Jan-2023

    Reply/Say

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  51. 15-Nov-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  52. 15-Sep-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Washim

  53. 15-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 13-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary – MCA 102/2022 The Principal District Judge Washim set aside an ex-parte order against respondent no. 1 (Sub-Divisional Officer) dated 30/01/2023. Respondent no. 1 had requested recusal of the ex-parte order, which the applicants opposed. The court granted the request, holding that interests of justice require respondent no. 1 be given fair opportunity to participate in proceedings before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case