Kavita Maroti Tayade vs Omkar Tukaram Savant — 29/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378,(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 28th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHWS010009972025
Filing Number
614/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
29/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavita Maroti Tayade
Adv. SOMANI AMOL RAMESHCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Omkar Tukaram Savant
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2 and ASJ, Washim
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 22-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Kavita v. Omkar (Cri. Appeal No. 29/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, granted the appellant's application under Section 430 BNSS to suspend the conviction and sentence pending appeal to the High Court. Omkar Savant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to three months rigorous imprisonment with compensation of Rs. 2,30,000 payable to Kavita within one month. The court stayed the judgment and released the accused on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, on condition he approaches the High Court within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Kavita v. Omkar (Cri. Appeal No. 29/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, granted the appellant's application under Section 430 BNSS to suspend the conviction and sentence pending appeal to the High Court. Omkar Savant was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to three months rigorous imprisonment with compensation of Rs. 2,30,000 payable to Kavita within one month. The court stayed the judgment and released the accused on personal and surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, on condition he approaches the High Court within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts