State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon vs Rushabh Namdeo Rathod Advocate - Dy. Chief LADCS R. B. Vispute — 93/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1),76,333. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case Child Prot. - Spl.Case under POCSO Act

CNR: MHWS010008652025

Filing Number

538/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

93/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court, Washim

Judge

12-District Judge 3 and Asj, Washim

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

367

Police Station

MALEGAON

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1),76,333
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rushabh Namdeo Rathod Advocate - Dy. Chief LADCS R. B. Vispute

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  4. 20-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Rushabh Namdeo Rathod (Case 93/2025) The accused filed an application seeking cancellation of evidence (Articles A, B, C at Exhibit 25)—seized clothes of a victim—alleging the prosecution fraudulently produced them without proper identification during witness examination. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding that the evidence was properly identified and marked during the first witness's (Mahesh Devanand Deshmukh's) chief examination on 23.02.2026, and the accused's contention that it was improperly introduced during the second witness's cross-examination was incorrect. Order: Application rejected (20.05.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 20-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  6. 13-May-2026

    Order on Exh

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  9. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  14. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  15. 28-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  16. 15-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  17. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  18. 22-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  20. 29-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  21. 17-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  22. 04-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 04-Nov-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  24. 03-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  25. 30-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  26. 16-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  27. 14-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  28. 09-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  29. 04-Oct-2025

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 2 and Asj, Washim

  30. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Rushabh Namdeo Rathod (Case 93/2025) The accused filed an application seeking cancellation of evidence (Articles A, B, C at Exhibit 25)—seized clothes of a victim—alleging the prosecution fraudulently produced them without proper identification during witness examination. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding that the evidence was properly identified and marked during the first witness's (Mahesh Devanand Deshmukh's) chief examination on 23.02.2026, and the accused's contention that it was improperly introduced during the second witness's cross-examination was incorrect. Order: Application rejected (20.05.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case