State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod Through SDPO Mangrulpir vs Ashok Narayan Gandole Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR — 35/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,408,409,420,468,471,477,A,120,B,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.Case ACB - Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act
CNR: MHWS010008462022
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
447/2022
Filing Date
15-06-2022
Registration No
35/2022
Registration Date
15-06-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
389
Police Station
RISOD
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Risod Through SDPO Mangrulpir
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Ashok Narayan Gandole Advocate - MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR
Varsha Ashok Gandole Helaskar
Ganesh Balaji Dhole
Aruna Sanjay Halge
Shakuntalabai Balaji Dhole Kasar
Mahesh @ Vivek Dnyandev Devgire
Haribhau Dnyandev Devgire
Madhukar Narayan Helaskar
Uddhav Narayan Helaskar
Adv. MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR
Samadhan @ Durgaprasad Madhukar Helaskar
Adv. DESHPANDE AVINASH RAMKRISHNA
Santosh Uddhav Helaskar
Adv. MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR
Upendra Gunwantrao Muley
Adv. Deshmukh Uday Achyutrao
Bhagwat Chhagan Pede
Dinesh Namdev Dorshetwar
Vinod Sahebrao Pandhare
Bharat Dnyandev Devgire
Santosh Badriprasad Somani
Adv. Jumde Namdev Trymbak
Yuvraj Limbaji Pandhare
Dhanajay Manohar Halge
Adv. MORE SUDHIR DAMODAR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-05-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Spl. ACB Case No. 35/2022 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the bank to deposit the lien amount in court and remove the freeze entry from the accused's bank account within eight days. The court balanced the state's interest in preserving funds against the accused's constitutional right to practice as a Chartered Accountant, noting that the freeze was causing him severe hardship and preventing professional employment opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Spl. ACB Case No. 35/2022 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court directed the bank to deposit the lien amount in court and remove the freeze entry from the accused's bank account within eight days. The court balanced the state's interest in preserving funds against the accused's constitutional right to practice as a Chartered Accountant, noting that the freeze was causing him severe hardship and preventing professional employment opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts