State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon vs Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Navghare Advocate - SATHE BHUSHAN SHRIRAM — 50/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,504. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHWS010007342022
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
367/2022
Filing Date
11-05-2022
Registration No
50/2022
Registration Date
11-05-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court, Washim
Judge
6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
FIR Details
FIR Number
531
Police Station
MALEGAON
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Malegaon
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Navghare Advocate - SATHE BHUSHAN SHRIRAM
Hearing History
Judge: 6-District Judge-1 and ASJ, Washim
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - Sessions Case No. 50/2022 Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Navghare sought relaxation of a bail condition prohibiting him from entering the complainant's village, citing a serious accident and injury requiring 45 days of bed rest and maternal care. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed, arguing relatives could assist him. The court partially granted the application, relaxing the village entry restriction for 45 days from September 30, 2022, based on medical evidence, after which the restriction would resume until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - Sessions Case No. 50/2022 Dnyaneshwar Ramdas Navghare sought relaxation of a bail condition prohibiting him from entering the complainant's village, citing a serious accident and injury requiring 45 days of bed rest and maternal care. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed, arguing relatives could assist him. The court partially granted the application, relaxing the village entry restriction for 45 days from September 30, 2022, based on medical evidence, after which the restriction would resume until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts